The New Ten Commandments:


 

ffc264a1d63083ef4728f242d14a9b2fc1871789

1) Thou shall believe that “they” are the “Chosen”

2) If you see their numbers extremely over-represented in high positions of power and control thou shall not mention, except if it was to praise their “superior” IQ

3) If you become aware that they are “running the show” in the media thou shall
only glorify “their talents”

4) If you come to notice their grip in the world of finance thou shall be in awe of their “outstanding aptitude”

5) If you detect their attempted steering of social progress or revolutionary movements, thou shall only explain it with their “admirable righteousness, evolved integrity and exceptional morality”

6) Thou shall not compare their unique suffering with any other

640x392_31012_135917

7) Thou shall revere the holocaust –faithfully, as narrated by their gurus, with all thy heart

8) Thou shall have no doubt in your heart of the number 6 million

9) Thou shall not criticize “Israel” the “light unto nations”, and thou shall honour it’s
eternal right to exist as a “Jewish state”

10) Thou shall sacrifice as many “goyim” humans as possible (especially those who dare to say NO), and on the altar of their conquest, greed, arrogance, and supremacy, thou shall bow down and worship

f67369e117113fcd35894e3987764a894edfc3e6

I for one, fully reject the concept of “Chosen-ness” , fully reject the concept of “superior Jewish intelligence”, and I fully reject the concept of “superior Jewish morality”, i.e. that Jews have always been at the “helm of social progress”.

 

Will that make me a racist anti-Semite?

.

Screen Shot 2014-09-26 at 09.37.34

.

Who is the RACIST?

If believing that: Jews and non-Jews are equal in intellect, morality, spirituality and in their responsibility for their own actions; if believing that is a crime, then I am the
first to be called a criminal.

If believing that the statement: “Jews are unique and special beings, with unique Divine souls” is a racist, chauvinistic and supremacist statement; then I plead guilty of racism.

If believing that “ALL mankind, Jews and non-Jews alike, are equal in humanity and in their accountability before the law”, is anti-Semitic, then call me anti-Semite.

If believing that no man is superior to another in intellect by the virtue of race or religion, is considered supremacy, in this Orwellian world, then call me supremacist.

If we choose not to actively expose and challenge such bizarre myths, and instead opt to turn a blind eye to such outlandish racism embedded in the doctrine of some orthodox Judaic sects, if we don’t break the taboo about the ugly ideology that
motivates and animates the Zionist’s fascism, then undoubtedly we would be sharing the guilt of complicity, active alliance and passive complacency, by our sheer silence.

We, the people concerned must make an unambiguous stance: the choice has to be made between supporting humanity, justice and equality or supporting racism, dominance and supremacy.

550412_511741572170641_1596264860_n

 

​Judeophilia


Judeophile

Someone who believes that:

  • Jews are the “chosen”, to love them is mandatory on every human being, and not to love them is a demonic feeling punishable by law
  • The unique suffering of Jews is unmatched and incomparable to any other, if you dare compare it to others’ your thoughts are criminal, punishable by law.
  • Racism exists in every group of people except Jews, confronted with evidence they proclaim those racists are not Jews, they are mere Zionists.
  • Laws which applies to all people do not apply to Jews, for when they commit a crime they cease to be Jews, but if they engage in a positive act, it is paramount that you emphasize they are Jews.
  • If you utter the words Jewish supremacy in any shape or form, you are a notorious “antisemite”.

 

Barack Obama has awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom to Criminal Israeli President Shimon Peres

 

Solving a Problem


masters-over-the-world

 

 

UNDERSTANDING a problem is the first step towards SOLVING it

We will NEVER get the right ANSWER if we misunderstood the question

Understanding fully the Palestinian problem is the first step towards solving this grave injustice

Thus, the importance of what we do here online

What we do is not just wasteful “intellectual exercise” or passing time “playing with words or ideas”

It is the WAY to reach comprehensive UNDERSTANDING of the heart of the problem, to be able finally find ways to SOLVE it

Understanding the EXPANSIONIST, EXCLUSIVIST, IDEOLOGICAL SUPREMACIST, ISOLATIONIST, GENOCIDAL NATURE of the illegitimate entity occupying Palestine will no doubt enable us to choose the right methods in dealing with it

 

00 nose1 copy

 

Wicked


Half of Jewish high schoolers say Arabs shouldn’t vote

59% of high school students consider themselves right-wing, only 13% identify as left-wing

 

If we assume that these figures mirrors the views of adult “israelis”, then facts are:

Those 13% who identify as “left-wing” function as a shield for the majority “right-wing”.  They criticise their hawks in order to protect them from any backlash from the International community.

Worse, out of those 13%, there is the “enlightened” handful who declare their “unequivocal support” for Palestinians, and they advocate “equal rights for all”. They present themselves as the beacon of morality and the ultimate saviours of Palestinians, continue to deceive Palestinians that “peace” is just round the corner, if only they followed their advice.

Their “genius” strategy entails that Palestinians should embrace “israel” as “reality”, an unchangeable, unquestionable fact on the ground, and move tactically within the framework of this reality.

They advise them to exert some soft to moderate pressure on “israel” via BDS to force “israel” to give Palestinians “equal rights”.
In other words, what they are asking is “israel” annexes what remains of Palestine, to create “one state [israel] with equal rights for all”, in which Palestinians can ask nicely (without “violence”) to have a vote and to become full “israeli” citizens with “equal rights”.

Never mind the abhorrent racism and ideological supremacy of Jewish “israelis”.

Never mind they sit on stacks of weapons of mass destruction.

Never mind that Jewish “israeli” supremacists would still have their grip on all apparatus of power; political, military, financial, educational, social, developmental etc.

Never mind that would allow “israel” to keep hold of all STOLEN lands and property

Never mind that this would absolve “israeli” criminals from ever facing courts of justice or paying for their crimes, or compensating Palestinians for the seven decades of systematic abuse, oppression and exploitation.

Wicked.

NO to the “two state solution”, which enables the illegitimate entity to keep hold of 90% of historic Palestine.
NO to the “one state solution” which allows the illegitimate entity to expand and takeover 100% of Palestine.

YES to the FULL LIBERATION of Palestine

Screen Shot 2015-09-29 at 23.38.25

Conditional Solidarity ! No Thank you


.

Screen Shot 2016-04-15 at 12.06.21

Where is their abhor against Jewish supremacy?

 

No one displays CONDITIONAL solidarity with Palestinians as much as Jewish “supporters” do

When Palestinians question the absurdity of such stance, and point to CONFLICT of INTEREST, they are accused of “antisemitism”

When Palestinians request their Jewish “supporters” to condemn the rampant ideological Jewish supremacy and racism, again they accuse Palestinians of “antisemitism”

It is perfectly understandable, nay justified that Palestinians do not particularly love their rapists and tormentors, or those who frantically support them

Furthermore, Palestinians, NOT Ashkenazi Jews, are the TRUEST SEMITES

Thus, calling a SEMITE Palestinian “antisemite” is one the greatest chutzpah ever

This NONSENSE has to stop

NO to conditional solidarity

Remove the word “antisemitism” from the Palestinian discourse

 

I call upon Palestine Solidarity Movement  NOT fall prey to such manipulation conducted by individuals or organizations with compromised loyalty who appointed themselves controllers of the flow of information and sole owners of language, entitled to define meanings of words and to exclude those who disagree, thus they take steer the Palestinian solidarity towards the acceptance of “soft” yet final and permanent colonization of Palestine, thus to eliminate the prime objective of the solidarity movement; the unconditional support of Palestinians and their quest for Full Liberation of All Historic Palestine.

.

 Screen Shot 2016-04-15 at 12.03.35

 

Kosher Palestinians!


static1.squarespace.com

A kosher Palestinian, is the one who he believes in:

  • The “specialness” and “chosen-Mess” of Jews”, for they always “know better” and no movement or organization can function if not headed by them and guided by their “light”

 

  • They believe that anyone on earth be called racist supremacist except Jews, so they take “strong stands” against “Palestinian racism” and “Palestinian antisemitism” if Palestinians question the right of the “Jewish state” to exist, but a Kosher Palestinian never ever questions Jewish supremacy and racism, worse, they accuse those who request a condemnation of ideological Jewish supremacy of being “antisemites”

 

  • They also believe in the “primacy of Jewish suffering”, more than their own, and revere the “holocaust” as their one and only true deity worthy of worshiping, never to be doubted or questioned


 

Shame for Fame


 

I avoided writing about this topic, trying to give Palestine Chronicle and its chief editor Ramzy Baroud the benefit of the doubt, but I don’t think keeping silent is an option any more

In March 2011 I met Ramzy Baroud during his UK tour, I invited him to stay with us in my family home, where he was warmly welcomed. As we both were devoted to working for liberation of our homeland and advocating for justice for our people, I thought we had forged a mutually respectful friendship.

I continued to communicate with Baroud via email and Facebook, sharing my poems, thoughts, comments and articles with him, with hardly any response, if ever.  The communication was a one way street, but I kept giving him the benefit of the doubt and finding excuses, for he is such a busy journalist.

Screen Shot 2016-04-12 at 23.36.55

Screen Shot 2016-04-12 at 23.37.01

 

In December 2013, I posted a series of  comments on Palestine Chronicle of which PC editor published only three while censoring the most crucial.

Being one of my Facebook friends, I wrote to Mr Baroud privately inquiring about the reason of censoring my comments, I never received a reply.

Today, April 12, 2016, I notice that he had deleted me from his list of friends (not sure when),  I contacted him again asking for an explanation, again no reply.

 

Screen Shot 2016-04-13 at 01.52.48

 

Also today, I noticed that the Palestine Chronicle team, which consists of “professional journalists and respected writers and authors“, has published one of my photos which I took during my visit to Palestine in 2012, without asking permission or giving credit.

Furthermore, in the same edition of Palestine Chronicle two poems are published: One is eerily the same topic and same title as a poem I published three years ago and had sent to Mr Baroud.

The second poem also bears almost the same title and has the same topic as one of my prose/poems, written in 2012, and is illustrated by my photograph that I used for the same publication, a photo that is significant because it depicts the garden that triggered me to write the prose/poem in the first place. Mr Baroud also received it via email at the time.

This is irrefutably not a coincidence, and is irrefutably an act of unwarranted hostility, an attempt by a fellow Palestinian to dispossess the intellectual rights of a fellow Palestinian author.

Ramzy Baroud, I am asking you for an explanation. What is going on? What has gone so wrong with you that you engage in such unfathomable act?

Why does Palestine Chronicle participate in censoring Palestinian voices and obfuscating their work, bordering on plagiarism?

Do we really need thought commissars in our movement of liberation?

Is it excommunication against untamed Palestinian voices whose narrative is not approved by anti-Zionist rabbis and lacking the kosher stamp?

 

This kind of subliminal attacks coming from a Palestinian, who brags of his father being a “freedom fighter” and who engages into yet another dispossession and attempted demoralization of a fellow Palestinian freedom fighter is beyond shameful

Is that the price of fame? Does Mr Baroud really think that it will not cost him discredit and shame?

Palestine Chronicle, Tuesday, April 12, 2016

Screen Shot 2016-04-12 at 23.23.08 copy 2

 

Poetry for Palestine, July 8, 2011

 

Screen Shot 2016-04-13 at 01.21.41 copy 2

Palestine Chronicle, Saturday, April  9, 2016

As well as publishing one of Nahida’s photos without authorisation

Screen Shot 2016-04-12 at 23.22.51 copy 2

 

 

Poetry for Palestine, April 28, 2012

 

Screen Shot 2016-04-13 at 01.37.42 copy 2

 

Ali Abunimah and the Zionist Narrative


Source:   https://uprootedpalestinians.wordpress.com/2016/04/11/ali-abunimah-and-the-zionist-narrative/

By Barbara McKenzie

Ali Abunimah has been speaking to pro-Palestine groups in Australasia and last week was in Wellington, New Zealand, as a guest of the Wellington Palestine Group.

Abunimah has a profile as a pro-Palestinian activist and as a founder and editor of the blog Electronic Intifada. He is also known to be at the forefront of the campaign to purge from the pro-Palestine movement those who are not deemed to be sufficiently opposed to antisemitism. He has accordingly been described by his critics as a ‘gatekeeper on the payroll of his Jewish Zionist friends’, a ‘soft Zionist’, a ‘sabbos goy’ and many other things less printable.

My reading on Abunimah before the meeting revealed that he is associated with campaigns to vilify and exclude from the Palestine movement a considerable number of pro-Palestinian activists, including many of Jewish ancestry, like Richard Falk, John J. Mearsheimer, Gilad Atzmon, Paul Eisen, Jonathan Azaziah, and Israel Shamir, or Palestinian backgrounds, such as Samir Abed-Rabbo, Ramzy Baroud, Nahida Izaat, Sammi Ibrahim, Sameh Habib and Jonathan Azaziah.

He is also complicit in the attempt to ostracise the highly regarded Alison Weir of the Not in My Name campaign, which led to the resignation of the Free Palestine Movement from the US Campaign to End Israeli Occupation.

Perhaps the most famous, or infamous, example of Abunimah’s exclusion campaign is his statement calling for the disavowal of the ‘racism, antisemitism of Gilad Atmon’, signed by 22 Palestinian activists.

At the meeting in Wellington Abunimah gave a good speech about the current situation in Palestine, and then focused on the BDS campaign, though without addressing long-term solutions, eg whether there should be one or two states. He also mentioned the Palestinian killed by an Israeli soldier in Hebron recently.

I wanted to address the issue of Abunmah’s opposition to other activists, and began by referring to Gideon Levi’s article about the Hebron murder, quoting as follows:

‘Never have so many cheered such a vile murderer. …This combination of racism and thirst for blood is not only repulsive, it’s also volatile and dangerous… it’s doubtful there’s another Western society whose racism is accompanied by such bloodlust.’

I pointed out that while Levi’s target audience was the people of Israel, there are people whose focus is outside of Israel, aiming to change the mindset of individuals or communities, Jewish and/or non-Jewish, who support ethnic cleansing and land theft in Palestine. However Abunimah has worked to exclude many of these people from the movement such as Gilad Atzmon, Paul Eisen, Alison Weir …

At this point Abunimah interjected, declaring that it was not in his power to purge anyone. These people were all bigots and white supremacists. Abunimah was not going to debate with someone who supported racist bigots.

Based on my reading I had rather expected Abunimah would respond with a personal attack, and I wasn’t surprised that he should be less that honest about his involvement in shutting people out of the Palestine movement, though I would have liked to ask exactly why these people were ‘bigots’.

In the unlikely event I was allowed to continue, I had hoped to focus on the ‘disavowal’ of Atzmon. There have been some excellent responses to this statement (see below). Some concentrate on defending the various accusations levelled at Atzmon, while Nahida Izaat picks up on the Talmudic nature of the language used – she associates, for example, the word ‘disavowal’ with the Judaic concept of Herem, the ban imposed on an individual to separate from the rest of the community (Izaat’s findings were echoed by Atzmon, who commented that ‘we aren’t just dealing with a cult discourse, … we are actually dealing with a rabbinical operation that exercises the most repulsive Judaic excommunication tactics’).

I myself planned to address Abunimah regarding the narrative he espouses.

‘We reaffirm that there is no room in this historic and foundational analysis of our struggle for any attacks on our Jewish allies, Jews, or Judaism; nor denying the Holocaust; nor allying in any way shape or form with any conspiracy theories, far-right, orientalist, and racist arguments, associations and entities. Challenging Zionism … must never become an attack on Jewish identities, nor the demeaning and denial of Jewish histories in all their diversity. ‘

It is clear from this statement that, leaving aside the Palestine issue proper, Abunimah’s language and priorities are identical to that of the most extreme Zionist: the focus on antisemitism, conspiracy theories, and above all holocaust denial. These are the three main strategies for the Zionist activist.

Firstly, to keep the conversation fixed on antisemitism, to keep Palestinian activists tip-toeing round Jewish sensibilities in order to neutralise criticism. Hence the huge campaign against Gilad Atzmon, who calls out the Jewish community for their support for Israel.

Secondly, to carry out personalised and derogatory attacks against anyone who asks awkward questions. In her video presentation on how the CIA influences the media Sharyl Atkinson listed a few words which alert people to what she calls astroturfing, one of them being ‘conspiracy’ (‘astroturfers seek to controversialise those who disagree with them’). ‘Conspiracy theorist’ and ‘truther’ are terms commonly applied to those who investigate 9/11, though I have been called a ‘truther’ by Ahmad Idrees, when I produced evidence from MIT that the Syrian government can’t have been responsible for the Gouta sarin attack.

Most important for any Zionist is to protect the holocaust cult. So successful have Zionists been with regard to control of the holocaust narrative, that Germany, Austria and France are prepared to compromise themselves morally and intellectually by criminalising the dissemination of serious research into the holocaust. Anyone active on social media who has any contact with the subject knows that the very people who are totally callous when it comes to the abuses inflicted on Palestinians scream ‘Jew hate’ if one so much as defends someone who questions any aspect of the holocaust.

It is extraordinary that a pro-Palestinian activist should package up and present these three major Zionist strategies as fundamental to the Palestinian cause, that the sensibilities of those who support the most racist country in the developed world, arguably on the whole planet, should matter so much more to him than the Palestinian cause itself.

‘Contrary to the understanding and lopsided logic of Mr Ali Abunimah and his cohorts, discussing and criticising the ideologies, the politics, the aims, and the motivations of some Jewish Zionists or anti-Zionist persons or groups, is NOT anti-Semitic. Such criticism does not occur “simply because they are Jews”:

‘We criticise their obfuscation of truth, by acting as filterers of information, attempting to prevent people from learning about issues, vital to understanding the Palestinian catastrophe;

‘We criticise the hysterical manner in which they react against people who attempt to examine and understand the global and powerful Jewish-Zionist networks and lobby, their unrelenting support of “Israel” and it’s ramification on Palestine and the Palestinian cause’ (Nahida Izaat)

It is also consistent with Abunimah’s ‘soft Zionist’ viewpoint that, like all Zionists, he promotes the NATO discourse on the war on Syria, exemplified above all by his writings on the Yamouk refugee camp.

Abunimah is a strong advocate for BDS, which is supported by most Palestine activists. However, to return to the Wellington meeting, someone present asked how effective BDS can be if the US will always underwrite Israel – and we know that as things stand it will do just that. BDS should be combined with strong attacks on the communities that back Israel and on American acquiescence towards the power of AIPAC, and furthermore with questioning of the Zionist narrative and the motivations behind it. If Abunimah cannot be part of this, or at least back those who are, his usefulness to the Palestinian cause is questionable.

Bibliography

Ali Abunimah: Palestinian writers, activists, disavow racism, anti-Semitism of Gilad Atzmon
https://electronicintifada.net/blogs/ali-abunimah/palestinian-writers-activists-disavow-racism-anti-semitism-gilad-atzmon

A large number of activists, Jews, Palestinians and others, have replied to this, most being referenced after Roger Tucker’s article:

Nahida Izaat: https://uprootedpalestinian.wordpress.com/2012/03/16/disavow-with-no-mercy-not-in-my-name/

Roger Tucker: https://sites.google.com/site/onedemocraticstatesite/archives/writings-of-the-editor/ali-abunimah-and-gilad-atzmon-at-the-ok-corral [with a good list of related articles]

Israel Shamir: http://www.israelshamir.net/English/To_disavow.htm

The Free Palestine Movement, letter of resignation from the US Campaign to End Israeli Occupation: http://freepalestinemovement.org/2015/07/22/free-palestine-movement-resignation-from-the-u-s-campaign-to-end-the-israeli-occupation/

Gilad Atzmon talks to Ken o’Keefe: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nI7r1eQDGxo(‘Jewish power is the capacity to stop us talking about Jewish power’)

Sharyl Atkinson, Astroturf and manipulation of media messages:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-bYAQ-ZZtEU

Yarmouk Refugee Camp

Abunimah has written several articles on Yarmouk, e.g.https://electronicintifada.net/blogs/ali-abunimah/dont-forget-us-here-photos-reveal-devastation-syrias-yarmouk-camp

Response from the Niqnaq blog: https://niqnaq.wordpress.com/2014/01/27/on-the-subject-of-yarmouk-ali-abunimah-continues-to-peddle-absolutely-one-sided-pro-west-propaganda/

Statement from Syrian Solidarity Movement:http://www.syriasolidaritymovement.org/yarmouk/ssm-statement-on-yarmouk/

Eva Bartlett, Vanessa Beeley and others have written extensively about the situation in Yarmouk.

Yarmouk File from The Wall Will Fall:https://thewallwillfall.wordpress.com/category/yarmouk/

PLO’s view on Syrian handling of Yarmouk:https://syrianfreepress.wordpress.com/2015/04/10/cem-44621/

Truth About AIPAC & Jewish Political Lobbying


James Perloff

formerly refugebooks.com

zaidpub

A Muslim's View

billziegler1947

ziegler.bill@gmail.com

| truthaholics

Exposing Truth Behind Media Spin

No Time to Think

The words, poems, stories and thoughts of award winning writer and journalist, Nic Outterside

Plato's Guns

M i d e a s t Newsstand

Palestine Momentum

Writers For Palestine

Poetry for Palestine

Palestine, Poetry, Truth-Seeking,

WikiPeeks Blog

Truth is just around the corner

مدونة عزت غيث

قوانين، مذكرات، مقالات المحامي عزت غيث مكتب المحامي عزت نصر غيث : عمان - جبل الحسين - دوار فراس - عمارة قدورة تلفون 0797900678 - 0788850180

themharaintifada

Just another WordPress.com site

Strings of Soulfulness

The strings of my life’s soulfulness in the beauty of eternity.

مدوّنة مريم

“Each generation must discover its mission, fulfill it or betray it, in relative opacity.”

YA BAKİ ENTEL BAKİ

"İlahi Ente Maksudi ve Rızake Matlubi"

The question of Palestine

Palestine is still the question

gabrielarad06

This WordPress.com site is an experiment

لماذا غزة؟ Why Gaza?

An American searching for answers in the Middle East

Fig Trees and Vineyards

A blog by Richard Edmondson

Rehmat's World

"There is no compulsion in religion," - Holy Qur'an

hussienclimateleaders

The Climate Crises

PALESTINE FROM MY EYES

Generating a fearless and humanising narrative on Palestine!

American Everyman

"The Future is not inherited, it is Achieved" JFK

Uprootedpalestinians's Blog

Palestinians are at the heart of the conflict in the M.E Palestinians uprooted by force of arms.. Yet faced immense difficulties have survived, kept alive their history and culture, passed keys of family homes in occupied Palestine from one generation to the next.

The Ugly Truth

Intelligent 'anti-Semitism' for thinking Gentiles

My Palestine

The Scribbling of an ordinary Palestinian from occupied Palestine

Eye On Palestine

By the Palestinian Photographer Ahmad Mesleh

The Passionate Attachment

America's entanglement with Israel

Occupied Palestine | فلسطين

Blogging 4 Human Rights & Liberation of Palestine! فلسطين

Mystery Worshiper's Blog

The Prince of Peace does not "take out" (assassinate) world leaders.

The Slog.

An antidote to ideology

Aletho News

ΑΛΗΘΩΣ

John's Consciousness

Exploring our "Inner Evolution"

Sami, The Bedouin.

Writing from and for Palestine

Maidhc Ó Cathail

Writing and Analysis

%d bloggers like this: